Attorney General Opinions

Attorney General opinions.

Sign up for Consumer Alerts

Stay informed on the latest consumer scams.

Attorney General Newsletter

Get updates on the Nebraska Attorney General's Office.

AGO Opinion 97046

Imposition of State Sanctions Against Employers Who Hire Illegal Aliens
Opinion 97046

DATE: September 11, 1997

SUBJECT: Imposition of State Sanctions Against Employers Who Hire Illegal Aliens

REQUESTED BY: Senator Donald G. Preister

WRITTEN BY:Don Stenberg, Attorney General

L. Steven Grasz, Deputy Attorney General




You have requested an Attorney General's Opinion as to whether the State

of Nebraska could enact a law imposing fines on businesses or employers who hire

illegal aliens/undocumented workers. You note in your request that the federal

government regulates immigration, and you ask whether a state statute imposing

such fines on employers would be constitutional.




The U.S. Supreme Court has "long recognized the preeminent role of the

Federal Government with respect to the regulation of aliens within our borders."

Toll v. Moreno, 458 U.S. 1, 102 S.Ct. 2977, 2982 (1982). However, federal

preemption of state laws regarding illegal aliens is not automatic. In DeCanas

v. Bica, 424 U.S. 351, 96 S.Ct. 933 (1976), the Supreme Court addressed the issue

of whether a California statute prohibiting employers from knowingly employing

illegal aliens was unconstitutional under the Supremacy Clause of the U.S.

Constitution. Id. at 935. The California statute imposed fines on employers of

$200-$500 for each offense. Id. at 935 n.1.




The Supreme Court held that federal law, including the Immigration and

Nationality Act, 66 Stat. 163, as amended, 8 U.S.C. § 1101 et. seq., did not

preempt the California statute. Id. at




937. The Court stated that "States possess broad authority under their police

powers to regulate the employment relationship to protect workers within the

State." Id. at 937. However, federal law, as it then existed, did not contain

penalties for hiring illegal aliens. The Court noted that "H.R. 8713, now

pending in Congress, would amend 8 U.S.C. § 1324 to provide a penalty for

knowingly employing an alien not lawfully admitted to the United States." Id.

at 936 n.4.




Today, 8 U.S.C. § 1324a makes it unlawful to hire an unauthorized alien,

and provides for civil penalties for each violation. Most importantly, for

purposes of the question presented, § 1324a(h)(2) now expressly provides that

"The provisions of this section preempt any State or local law imposing civil or

criminal sanctions (other than through licensing and similar laws) upon those who

employ, or recruit or refer for a fee for employment, unauthorized aliens."

(emphasis added).




Consequently, the answer to your question is that any state statute

imposing fines on employers for hiring illegal aliens would violate 8 U.S.C. §

1324a(h)(2) and the Supremacy Clause of the United States Constitution.




Sincerely yours,




DON STENBERG

Attorney General








Steve Grasz

Deputy Attorney General