AGO Opinion 97039
Payment to Counties for Holding Inmates Convicted of Felonies
Opinion 97039
DATE: August 4, 1997
SUBJECT: Payment to Counties for Holding Inmates Convicted of Felonies
REQUESTED BY: Senator Roger Wehrbein, Chairman,
Appropriations Committee
WRITTEN BY: Don Stenberg, Attorney General
Laurie Smith Camp, Deputy Attorney General
You have asked a number of questions regarding the obligation
of the state to reimburse counties for the cost of maintaining
inmates who have been convicted of offenses "punishable by
imprisonment" in facilities under the jurisdiction of the Nebraska
Department of Correctional Services. [DCS].
A recitation of applicable statutory provisions will precede
our discussion of the issues raised in your letter.
Neb. Rev. Stat. § 28-105 (1995) provides in part:
All sentences of imprisonment for Class IA, IB, IC, ID, II,
and III felonies and sentences of one year or more for Class
IV felonies shall be served in institutions under the
jurisdiction of the Department of Correctional Services.
Sentences of less than one year shall be served in the county
jail. . . .
Neb. Rev. Stat. § 28-106 (1995) provides in part:
Sentences of imprisonment in misdemeanor cases shall be served
in the county jail, except that in the following circumstances
the court may, in its discretion, order that such sentences be
served institutions under the jurisdiction of the Department
of Correctional Services:
(a) If the sentence is for a term of one year upon the
conviction of a Class I misdemeanor or for a combined term of
one year or more in the event of conviction of more than one
misdemeanor offense; [or]
(b) If the sentence is to be served concurrently with the
term for conviction of a felony. . . .
Neb. Rev. Stat. § 29-1002 (1995) provides in part:
The cost of keeping and maintaining any prisoner after his or
her conviction of any offense punishable by imprisonment in a
Department of Correctional Services adult correctional
facility, wherever he or she may be kept and confined, shall
be paid by the state according to the rate which may be
established by law at the time when such services may be
rendered or expenses incurred.
Neb. Rev. Stat. § 29-1003 (1995) provides in part:
The Director of Administrative Services shall allow the
account for the costs as provided for in Section 29-1002, and
draw warrants upon the treasury therefor, upon being furnished
with a certified copy of the judgment or sentence of the court
under which such convict is in prison, and an account verified
by affidavit, showing where and how long such convict has been
kept, pursuant to such sentence.
Neb. Rev. Stat. § 47-119 (Cum. Supp. 1996) provides:
[S]tate prisoner shall mean a person who has been convicted of
a felony and has started to serve the sentence imposed under
such conviction.
Neb. Rev. Stat. § 47-121 (1993) provides in part:
The county board of each county. . . confining state prisoners
within its jails shall receive $3.50 per day for boarding such
prisoners. . . . The sheriff or county board of corrections
shall, on the first day of January, April, July, and October
of each year, make a report in writing to the Director of
Administrative Services of the number of state prisoners in
custody in such county for the last three months before making
its report, when committed, and for what time, [and] the
amount due the county for boarding such prisoner or prisoners.
. . . Thereupon the director shall quarterly draw his or her
warrant upon the State Treasurer for the amount due to the
county treasurer of the county, and the amount drawn shall be
credited to the general fund of the county.
Basic principles of statutory construction established by the
Nebraska Supreme Court require that we (1) look at the statutory
objective to be accomplished, problem to be remedied, or purpose to
be served, and then place on the statute a reasonable construction
which best achieves its purpose, rather than a construction that
will defeat the purpose; and (2) conjunctively consider and
construe all statutory components to determine the intent of the
legislature, so that different provisions are consistent,
harmonious and sensible. See, e.g., State v. Joubert, 246 Neb. 287
(1994); Anderson v. Nashua Corp., 246 Neb. 420 (1994); and In Re
Guardianship & Conservatorship of Bloomquist, 246 Neb. 711 (1994).
Legislative history is not available to assist us in
ascertaining the legislature's purpose in enacting §§ 29-1002, 29-
1003, 47-119 and 47-121 because the core language of the statutes
originated in the legislature's earliest years. The legislative
history of bills making technical revisions to these statutes over
the years does not explain the legislature's original intent and
purpose. DCS annual reports inform us that Nebraska inmates were
confined in county jails and federal facilities in Nebraska's first
years of statehood. It is likely that the language in §§ 29-1002,
29-1003, 47-119 and 47-121 originated at a time when many inmates
who were convicted of felonies and sentenced to be imprisoned for
one year or more served their time in county jails due to a lack of
state correctional facilities.
Sections 28-105 and 28-106 were enacted as part of the
Nebraska Criminal Code in 1977 and reflect the more modern intent
of the legislature.
Although others may reach a different conclusion, we find that
the reasonable and sensible construction of the above statutes is
that inmates who are sentenced to serve a term of imprisonment of
one year or more may be confined in facilities under the
jurisdiction of DCS at the expense of the state. Such inmates
would include those sentenced to serve one year or more in prison
for felony convictions, Class I misdemeanor convictions,
consecutive misdemeanor convictions, misdemeanor convictions to be
served concurrently with felony convictions, and misdemeanor
sentences to be served consecutive to felony convictions. Inmates
sentenced to terms of imprisonment of less than one year are to be
confined in county jails at the expense of the county. Such
inmates would include those convicted of misdemeanors or felonies
having a sentence or combined sentence totaling less than one year.
The fact that an inmate has been sentenced to probation or to a
term of confinement for less than one year in a county jail upon
conviction of a felony would not cause the state to be responsible
for the cost of "keeping and maintaining" the inmate. Our
conclusion is reinforced by the fact that the legislature has
appropriated no funds for payment to counties under § 47-121, and
the fact that the counties have historically acquiesced in bearing
the cost of maintaining convicted felons who are sentenced to serve
less than one year in the county jails.
Neb. Rev. Stat. § 29-2401 (1995) provides that it is the
responsibility of the county sheriff to transport an inmate to DCS
when the inmate has been sentenced to that department. So, any
delay in the transfer of an inmate from a county jail to DCS would
be the responsibility of the county, and the state should not be
liable for the county's costs of "keeping and maintaining" any such
inmate. Your letter does not suggest that DCS has refused to
accept inmates from the counties when the inmates have been
sentenced to DCS.
It is recognized that there are times when inmates who have
been sentenced to DCS may be placed temporarily in a county jail,
just as there are times when a county inmate may be placed in DCS
facilities for "safekeeping." Neb. Rev. Stat. § 29-1001 (1995)
purports to give the person who has custody of an inmate the power
to place the inmate in any secure and convenient place of
confinement in the state. This statute can be construed to
authorize counties to place their inmates in DCS facilities. It
can also be construed to authorize DCS to place its inmates in
county facilities. In the past, DCS has billed counties for
"safekeeping" of county inmates on a contractual basis. If DCS
were to place one of its inmates in a county jail pursuant to § 29-
1001, and absent any agreement between DCS and the county for
reimbursement, the county would be entitled to bill the State of
Nebraska for $3.50 per day for boarding such inmates pursuant to §
47-121. If there were no funds appropriated by the legislature for
payment to the county under § 47-121, then the county would have
the right to submit a miscellaneous claim to the State Claims Board
seeking reimbursement under Neb. Rev. Stat. §§ 81-8,294 et seq.
(1996).
Sincerely,
DON STENBERG
Attorney General
Laurie Smith Camp
Deputy Attorney General